BMC acquires Partnerpedia for enterprise application store potential –


Published on July 30th, 2016 | by Jacob


BMC acquires Partnerpedia for enterprise application store potential

BMC acquires Partnerpedia for enterprise application store potential

Enterprise application store provider Partnerpedia continues to be clicked up by BMC Software, using the business service management provider presenting BMC AppZone, a repackaged, revamped iteration of Partnerpedia’s Universal Application Store.

Partnerpedia’s technology have been banging the drum of seamless integration and interoperability between your work and home application experience for 4 years, which is certainly something BMC can purchase into. For that enterprise, “the application store experience ranges from fun and simple to neither from the above”, BMC notes.

“Employees’ anticipations round the ease that they are able to access apps and sources are now being driven by their encounters within the consumer application store world,” a Partnerpedia blog announcing the purchase creates.

“The purchase of Partnerpedia allows BMC clients to satisfy this growing interest in simple, central use of corporate approved programs.”

David Manks, BMC senior director of solutions marketing was similarly excited, writing inside a consumerisation from it blog: “This announcement signifies another milestone validating the BMC dedication to streamlining the professional and personal experience for finish-customers.”

It can brings further authenticity to some pervasive trend within the enterprise: application management has become a significant power play in front of device management.

Captured Gartner forecast that 25% of businesses may have a company application store by 2017, that is certainly interesting, although not without critique MAM provider App47 welcomed the main focus on apps yet described the conjecture as “the safest bet within the short good reputation for mobile IT prognostication”.

The paradigm shift is apparent take the own device (BYOD) will end up take the own application (BYOA), although mobile phone management will forfeit ground to mobile application management.

That’s the logical step, and it is something which mobility vendors are beginning to determine. MobileIron authored in the [email protected] Blog earlier this year, for example, that “the take the own movement is growing from products to apps, that is changing enterprise mobility management.”

In cases like this, however, BMC notes that it is a large problem for employees also it, and it is a “huge market opportunity” simultaneously.

What organization from the acquisition and what this signifies for application management within the enterprise moving forward?


About the Author

2 Responses to BMC acquires Partnerpedia for enterprise application store potential

  1. Alex Fischer says:

    Megaman and Metroid = Megatroid….got it. Looks like a decent game.

  2. tralalalalalala50 says:

    Some i1ight:
    I agree, face unlock is less secure, currently, than entering patter1/PIN numbe1. However, this is an area that could change due to recent improvements in video image processing, I.e. They have algorithms that can use a mobile phone camera and determine the pulse, this would prevent using a picture from unlocking.
    Pattern unlock is less secure than PIN number due to the low entropy of choices available. (
    4-digit pin on a fixed keypad is the most secure of the three you listed, but less secure than a pin on a random keypad (meaning, the numbe1 shown would be randomly scrambled after every number is entered). This is because, capturing someone’s pin entry using a camera is quite easy since cameras are ubiquitous.
    A mathematical hash of a fingerprint, when done correctly can arguably be more secure than a fixed keypad PIN number alone, because if there is a failed attempt after 2 tries or so, you can have as the backup the PIN number. TouchID a uses a capacitive pulse (hence, why there is a metal ring around the home button for touchID a) that is reflected and imaged by the different parts of the finger. It is possible to get sub dermal capacitive information out of this pulse if the processing power is high enough (which is why, after each iteration of the iPhone, the se1itivity and accuracy of touchID has improved, and it will continue to). Soon, it will be incredibly difficult to fake a touchID a scanner with a simple piece of plastic molded like a print, because of the lack of sub dermal capacitive information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top ↑
  • Get newest posts?

    Email *
  • Hot Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Categories